What the Job Puts Back: Vicarious Resilience in Frontline Social Work
A woman calls in on a Tuesday because her lights are about to be cut off, and I can hear a kid in the background asking her something, and she puts her hand over the phone so I won’t hear how she answers him. She’s three days from a shutoff notice, she’s already burned every extension the utility company will give her, and she still asks me — before we even get to her case — how my day is going. Not performing politeness. Actually asking. I tell her it’s going fine. I do not tell her that an hour before her call I was on the phone with my own landlord, rearranging a move I didn’t choose and can’t really afford, boxes half-packed in a life that keeps getting rescheduled by other people’s timelines.
I used to think it was strange, how often that happens — how the people with the least cushion are the ones who ask if you’re okay. Now I think it’s the whole point.
The Math Nobody Explains in Training
Nobody tells you in orientation that this job will, eventually, become a strange kind of ledger. On one side: deadlines, denials, the particular cruelty of a system that requires paperwork from people who are actively losing the roof that would let them safely receive mail. On the other side, quietly accumulating whether I track it or not: proof, case after case, that people keep going. Not because they’ve found some enlightened acceptance of hardship. Because they don’t have the option not to. There is no version of their week where they get to stop. And they do it anyway, under conditions I have genuinely never had to survive.
There’s a name for this, if you go looking for it — vicarious resilience — but I didn’t need the term to notice the pattern. I don’t say this to romanticize what my clients are carrying — there’s nothing romantic about a shutoff notice, or sleeping in a car, or a kid learning to keep his voice down on the phone so his mom can concentrate. But something happens to you, session after session, denial after denial, when you sit across from that kind of persistence long enough. It stops feeling like other people’s tragedy that you’re absorbing and starts feeling like evidence. If they can do this — with this little, under this much pressure, with no guarantee it gets better — then whatever I’m hauling through my own week is, by comparison, survivable. I have a job. I have a vehicle, or at least reliable access to one, which in this line of work is its own kind of small miracle. Even when my own housing situation turns into something unceremonious and rushed, I still have somewhere to land. I’ve started treating that math less like guilt and more like fuel — not “it could be worse” as a way of shrinking my own problems, but as an actual, working reminder that I am not the most overloaded person in this exchange, and that if the people on the other end of the phone can keep moving forward with less, I can absolutely keep moving forward with more.
Writing What I’m Not Supposed to Look Away From
This is where the desk and the page start talking to each other. When I write a trauma survivor into a scene, the temptation — especially in genre fiction, especially in anything with romance or heat in it — is to smooth the edges. Give her the composed reaction. Let him say the wise thing at the right moment. I can’t do that anymore, not honestly, not after watching real people respond to real crises in ways that are messy and sideways and sometimes ungracious. People snap at the wrong person. People go quiet when you expect tears. People ask about your day when they should, by every reasonable measure, be falling apart. Writing it any other way isn’t just bad craft — it’s a small dishonesty toward the people who actually live it, a sanding-down of behavior that deserves to be seen clearly instead of prettied up for a reader’s comfort. The realism I fight for on the page is the same discipline I practice on the phone: don’t look away from how people actually are, because how they actually are is more resilient, more contradictory, and more worth writing than the sanitized version.
The Part Where I Answer My Own Question
So — can resilience travel sideways, the way trauma does, from the person on the other end of the desk to the person doing the intake? I think it can, and I think what it leaves behind isn’t inspiration exactly. It’s closer to permission. Permission to keep counting what I still have instead of only what’s precarious. Permission to let someone else’s harder week recalibrate what “hard” means for mine, without turning their suffering into my personal pep talk. It’s my job to hear these stories, and it isn’t — nothing in my job description says I’m supposed to let a stranger’s stubborn survival restring my own spine. But it does, every week, whether I ask it to or not. I keep the job. I keep the case notes. And underneath all of it, I keep counting the blessings that got handed to me for reasons I didn’t earn, using them the only way that makes sense: as fuel for the next obstacle, and the one after that.
Suggested Internal Links
- At the Crossroads: Trauma, Community, and the Quiet Heroism of Eligibility Specialists”
- Writing Trauma Survivors Realistically
- Navigating Compassion Fatigue
- How to Write Co-Regulation in Romance
- The Weight of the Smaller Self
External Links (for citation / further reading)
- Hernández, Gangsei & Engstrom, “Vicarious Resilience: A New Concept in Work With Those Who Survive Trauma” — Family Process, 2007 — the original paper coining the term; good citation for the “there’s a name for this” line.
- Hernandez-Wolfe, “Vicarious Resilience” (Migrant Clinician Network, accessible PDF) — plain-language overview of the concept if you want a link readers can actually open without a paywall.
- “Keeping Our Trauma Therapists Healthy with Vicarious Resilience” — Social Current — accessible, practice-oriented piece; good for the “permission” framing in your closing section.
- “Compassion Fatigue in Social Work” — Tulane School of Social Work — useful contrast/definition piece if you want to explicitly name what vicarious resilience is not (i.e., distinguish it from compassion fatigue and vicarious trauma).
